In the 18 motor units investigated (Protocol 2), the test peak increased significantly with TMS intensity AZD2281 chemical structure (15.3 ± 2.4% at 0.75 RMT, 28.1 ± 2.9% at 0.85 RMT and
42.6 ± 3.9% at 0.95 RMT; anova, P < 0.0001). The PSTHs of a single motor unit in Fig. 4 illustrate a 3-ms duration peak (27–30 ms), with largest bins at 27 and at 28.5–29 ms, suggesting a contribution of different corticospinal waves. In the 45 motor units investigated (Protocols 1 and 2), the mean latency of the earliest peak (P1) evoked in the PSTH was 27.1 ± 0.3 ms (range 22.5–30.5 ms). In 16/45 motor units (ten in Protocol 1 and six in Protocol 2), a second peak (P2) followed P1, and the mean time difference between P1 and P2 was 1.6 ± 0.1 ms (range 1.5–3 ms). These peaks are likely to represent motor unit discharge to separate components of a complex corticospinal volley, 1.6 ms corresponding to the interval between successive corticospinal waves (Day et al., 1989; Hallett, 2007; Reis et al., 2008). In such a case, the analysis was limited to P1, specifically to the three-first significant bins, to evaluate SICI on the first component of the corticospinal volley. In Protocol 1, the intensity of the test pulse was randomly changed to produce test peaks of different size, and to evaluate the resulting SICI evoked by a paired pulse using the difference between conditioned (paired
pulse) and test (isolated test pulse) peaks in the PSTHs. For inter-individual comparisons, the results of each motor unit were grouped into SGI-1776 molecular weight three categories of test peak size, according to the maximal size of the test peak (peakmax), and the intensity of the test pulse was normalized to RMT. Concerning the motor unit illustrated in Fig. 2, the test peak < 30% the maximal peak, within the three-first bins (25–25.5–26 ms), was evoked at 0.76 RMT (Fig. 2A). The test peak between 30 and 60% the maximal peak was evoked at 0.83 RMT (Fig. 2D), and the test > 60% was evoked at 0.90 RMT (Fig. 2G). In the 27 motor units investigated, the peaks < 30% were evoked with test stimuli
at 0.77 ± 0.01 RMT, the peaks between 30 and 60% Dehydratase were evoked with test stimuli at 0.84 ± 0.02 RMT, and the peaks > 60% were evoked with test stimuli at 0.90 ± 0.01 RMT (Fig. 2J). In each motor unit, the test (isolated test pulse) and conditioned PSTHs (paired pulses) were compared within the three-first bins in the peak. In the motor unit of Fig. 2, there was no significant change in peak size after paired pulses, between 25 and 26 ms, when the test peak was < 30% of the peakmax (the difference was 2% the number of stimuli, χ2 = 0.07; Fig. 2A–C). When the test peak was 30–60% of the peakmax (Fig. 2D), the conditioned peak was significantly smaller with the paired pulses (Fig. 2E), reflecting SICI (−14.4%, χ2 = 9.9, P < 0.05; Fig. 2F). When the test peak was > 60% of the peakmax (Fig. 2G), the conditioned peak was again smaller (Fig.