This procedure was repeated three times. After extracting the sugars, the beaker was placed in a chamber at 48 °C until all the solvent had evaporated. Then the sugars were suspended in
1 mL 80% ethanol, and the solution was transferred to an Eppendorf tube and kept at −20 °C. Before application, the samples were thawed, centrifuged at 16,100g for 10 min and filtered. Aliquots of 25 μL were analysed in a Shimadzu chromatograph selleck chemicals with a refraction index detector. The mobile phase used was acetonitrile:water (80:20). A Supelcosil LC-NH2 Supelco column, was used. Aiming mainly to quantify the sucrose in the samples, standard solutions were also applied containing known quantities of the sugars fructose, sucrose, raffinose and stachyose.
The sucrose concentration in each sample was determined by a calibration curve. Pearson correlation coefficients estimates were determined between the three methods used for sucrose quantification. ZD1839 research buy The following expression was used: rx1x2=cov(x1,x2)var(x1)var(x2)where r(x1,x2)r(x1,x2) = estimator of the correlation coefficients between the sucrose concentration determined by methods 1 and 2. Cov(x1,x2) = estimator of the covariance between the sucrose concentration determined by methods 1 and 2. var(x1) e var(x2) = estimators of the variances in the sucrose concentration determined by methods 1 and 2, respectively. For sucrose determination, we combined the action of invertase and glucose oxidase. This system was adapted to 96-well polystyrene plates. Sucrose determination was based on the following combined reactions: Sucrose→InvertaseGlucose+FructoseGlucose+O2+H2O→Glucose oxidaseGluconic acid+H2O2H2O2+Phenol→Benzoquinone(pink
colour-A490nm) In order to validate this new method, the sucrose content in soybean seeds was determined and compared with values obtained by HPLC and the enzymatic method of Stitt, two widely procedures used for sucrose quantification. The sucrose concentrations determined by these three methods and their respective coefficients of variation are shown in Table 1. Sucrose concentration in the seeds varied from 2.84% to 7.28%, in agreement with values cited by Kumar et al. (2010). The highest check details value for sucrose concentration was observed in cultivar Tadacha for the three methods tested. Our results show that there was consistency between the GOD/invertase method and those regularly used for sucrose determination. In addition, the GOD/invertase method is highly reproducible with coefficients of variation ranging from 4.87% to 12.08% (Table 1). The correlation coefficients between the methods are shown in Table 2. The GOD/invertase method presented a high correlation coefficient with the HPLC method. The value was 0.9685 when two different extract preparations were analysed, but this value increased to 0.9858 when the extract prepared for HPLC analysis was also used in the GOD/invertase method.