8343 Treatment failure for DMAC Patients are considered to ha

8.3.4.3 Treatment failure for DMAC. Patients are considered to have treatment failure if there is no clinical response and mycobacteria are isolated from Ivacaftor datasheet cultures after 4–8 weeks of MAC treatment to which the patient has been adherent. Drug susceptibility testing is of limited use for agents other than macrolides (category III recommendation). Ethambutol and rifabutin drug susceptibility to MAC has not been correlated to clinical response to therapy although there are data for clarithromycin and azithromycin [40,41]. A new combination of at least two drugs not previously used and to which the isolate should be susceptible should be constructed (category

III recommendation) – e.g. rifabutin (if not used previously), ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin or moxifloxacin [42], linezolid or amikacin. Other second-line agents (such as http://www.selleckchem.com/products/pexidartinib-plx3397.html ethionamide, prothionamide or cycloserine) have been used anecdotally. Many clinicians would continue ethambutol since it facilitates the penetration of other agents into mycobacteria (category IV recommendation). Immunomodulators, including granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and interferon gamma, can be

considered in cases of DMAC treatment failure. They are thought to work by inhibiting intracellular replication or enhancing in vitro intracellular killing of M. avium but there are no comprehensive studies of these agents [43,44]. 8.3.4.4 Treatment of focal MAC. There are no data to guide the type or duration of therapy for focal MAC. However, given that these tend to occur at higher CD4 cell counts and in the presence of effective HAART, most clinicians would recommend a three-drug regimen for a duration of at least 12 and possibly 24 months. Potential drug interactions

may lead to modifications in the HAART and/or antimycobacterial regimen (seeTable 8.1). Prophylaxis for DMAC with azithromycin 1250 mg weekly can be considered for individuals with CD4 counts <50 cells/μL (category Ib recommendation). Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated a benefit of clarithromycin/azithromycin Sinomenine or combinations of rifabutin and azithromycin [45,46] in reducing the incidence of MAC infection in patients with a CD4 count of <100 cells/μL. However, these studies were conducted prior to the introduction of HAART, which has itself resulted in a massive reduction in the incidence of MAC [3]. Furthermore, in one of these studies, where CD4 cell counts at diagnosis of DMAC were provided, it was observed that no cases of DMAC occurred with a CD4 count >50 cells/μL. Thus, lowering the CD4 count at which primary prophylaxis should be considered to <50 cells/μL is recommended in line with many other guidelines.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>