Figure 3B for the same patient with K19 staining highlights CoH loss around a portal tract. K7 staining highlighted the same biliary structures as did K19 staining, but also, in some specimens (Table 1), showed very focal periportal hepatocyte click here positivity which is common (although usually more widespread) in typical PBC biopsy specimens. EpCAM showed identical patterns of staining to

K19, differing in subcellular localization as expected (EpCAM is membranous, K19 is cytoplasmic), whereas no EpCAM-positive hepatocytes were seen in any normal, minimal change PBC, or CHC specimens (data not shown). In current American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; (AASLD) Practice Guidelines3 diagnosis of PBC can be made with compatible biochemical tests (esp. elevated AP), positive AMA (found in ∼95% of patients), and/or a compatible histological liver biopsy specimen. However, no standard case definition has been universally accepted.10 We have previously suggested that marked CoH loss (recognized selleck screening library by immunostaining for K19 or other cholangiocyte marker) is an earliest

change in PBC,4 a finding confirmed by others,11 although no studies have assessed clinical outcomes of patients with suspected PBC, who have minimally injured liver biopsies by routine stain, but marked CoH loss with immunostaining, a finding we term “minimal change PBC. We prospectively identified patients suspected to have PBC, but who did not meet definitive, nonbiopsy criteria for diagnosis. Five of six study patients had detectable serum autoantibodies, two of whom were AMA-positive prior see more to treatment (becoming AMA-negative with treatment) and four of six had either antismooth muscle antibody (ASMA) or ANA, serologic findings typical for AMA-negative PBC.12 The four AMA-negative patients (67%) is a higher rate than has been previously reported, which was 1/10 (10%) in our control group, in keeping with other published reports.13, 14 The difference may relate to our small cohort size and not have meaning; however, it could indicate that PBC identifiable only by CoH loss is such

an early disease stage that perhaps AMA have not yet become detectable by standard assays. To exclude the possibility that CoH loss is a nonspecific finding, unrelated to PBC, we compared the study group to two disease control specimen sets, both of which had preserved CoH. Compared to CHC, we confirm that CoH loss is not a nonspecific reaction to a chronic, portal, and peri-portal inflammation. In order to exclude the possibility that the study patients were simply recovering from an acute injury that would have spontaneously improved even without treatment, we assessed biopsy specimens from patients with chronic elevated serum liver tests for greater than 6 months, but without clinical data to indicate inciting infections or toxins. Biopsy specimens showed clustered macrophages indicating recent hepatic activity, but ongoing hepatitis was absent.