Previous reports 20–23 questioning the role of Fas in CD4+ T-cell-induced autoimmune diabetes studies rely on a single CD4+ T-cell specificity, using a TCR transgenic model. We propose that these monoclonal cells probably overrepresent one effector mechanism rather than the panoply of mechanisms involved in the overall in vivo scenario when a polyclonal population of effector cells, composed of several CD4+ T-cell clones, mediate diabetes. Therefore, our study suggests that see more the diabetogenic

action of NOD CD4+ T lymphocytes is very probably dependent on Fas expression on target cells. Our results indicate that diabetogenic CD4+ T cells may have an impaired ability to transfer diabetes into NOD/SCID recipients which over-express FasL on β cells compared to transgene-negative recipients. This could indicate immune privilege acquired by β cells as a consequence of the expression of FasL on their surface when they encounter activated, diabetogenic CD4+ T cells.

These data seem to be in apparent contradiction to that reported previously 14, in which overexpression of FasL in WT NOD mice accelerates diabetes onset. This paradox of FasL Talazoparib order expression on β cells could imply that expression of FasL on β cells favors an autoaggressive repertoire while the immune repertoire is maturing. In NOD/SCID mice, however, T- and B-cell subsets are missing, which might otherwise contribute to that final configuration of the immune repertoire in the islet. Last but not least, β-cell-specific transferred T cells are mostly activated, and hence, expressing Fas on their surface. Nevertheless, further work should be done to resolve this paradox. Here, we report that IL-1β does not play an essential role in spontaneous autoimmune diabetes although progression to diabetes is slower in NOD/IL-1R KO mice 34; the overall impact on the disease is not remarkable. Thus, caution should be exercised when translating in vitro studies in which islets or β-cell

lines are exposed to IL-1β since the results may not necessarily correspond to what is actually taking place in vivo during disease progression. Although IL-1β seems to play a crucial role in β-cell destruction in islet transplantation models 35–38, it does not do so in the NOD Phosphoprotein phosphatase model of spontaneous diabetes. This may be explained by the fact that during transplantation, the immune system is activated because of a strong inflammatory environment developing in and around the entire graft. However, in spontaneous T1D the immune response is cell-targeted and the pro-inflammatory environment is mostly limited to the islet. Therefore, IL-1β may help to exacerbate the spontaneous β-cell attack, but in its absence, other mechanisms may replace it (e.g. IFN-γ and/or TNF-α). Therefore, diabetogenic CD4+ T cells do not require Il-1β to mediate Fas-dependent β-cell death.