We sought to identify the prevalence of ischemia, subsequent cardiac events, and impact of sex, stress type, and symptom status on these findings in a cohort of stable outpatients with diabetes mellitus referred for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).\n\nMethods and Results-The study cohort included 575 consecutive outpatients with diabetes mellitus who underwent quantitative, gated single-photon emission computed tomography MPI. Clinical information, MG 132 stress MPI variables, and cardiac events were prospectively collected and analyzed. The study population was at intermediate risk of coronary artery disease or had known coronary artery disease (40.3%);

29% of patients were asymptomatic at the time of stress testing. Scintigraphic ischemia and significant (>= 10%) left ventricular ischemia were present in 126 patients (21.9%) and 29 patients (5.0%), respectively, and <1% of patients had early revascularization. The risk of ischemia was increased >2-fold by male sex (P<0.001), but was not impacted by pharmacological stress

(P=0.15) or presence of symptoms (P=0.89). During a median 4.4 years follow-up, the rate of cardiac death/nonfatal myocardial infarction was moderate at 2.6%/y (cardiac death 0.8%/y) in the total cohort, but was 5.7%/y in those with ischemia (P<0.001). Pharmacological see more stress predicted a higher cardiac event rate (P<0.001) but symptoms did not (P=0.55).\n\nConclusions-This cohort of stable outpatients AR-13324 research buy with diabetes mellitus referred for single-photon emission computed tomography had low rates of significant ischemia and early revascularization; an initially low cardiac event rate increased after 2 years. Independent predictors of cardiac death/nonfatal myocardial infarction were known coronary artery disease, pharmacological stress, and MPI ischemia. Nearly one third of those with events had a normal MPI, indicating a need for improved risk stratification.”
“Background: Weight changes are one of the most common symptoms experienced by patients with cancer. However, limited

empirical data are available on how cancer patients react to changes in their weight following their diagnosis and treatment. Objective: The present study aims to acquire a deeper understanding of cancer patients’ experiences with the physical manifestations of weight loss or gain, the consequence of these changes on their psychosocial life, and their self-management strategies. Methods: Semistructured interviews with 54 cancer patients were conducted longitudinally 2 to 3 weeks after their diagnosis. Follow-up interviews were carried out at 3, 6, and 12 months after diagnosis. Results: From the 54 patients recruited, 34 patients disclosed weight gain, whereas 37 experienced weight loss, suggesting that 17 patients experienced weight fluctuation.