2% of the total zooplankton The remaining 8 8% consisted of mero

2% of the total zooplankton. The remaining 8.8% consisted of meroplanktonic groups (molluscs, poly-chaetes, cirripedes, decapods and echinoderms) (Table 2). Copepods were the predominant component of the holoplankton

in Lake Timsah during all seasons in terms of species diversity and numerical abundance. Numerically, copepods made up 77.7% of the total zooplankton population, with an annual average of 17 119 individuals m−3 (Figure 3). Their larval selleck compound stages (nauplii and copepodites) respectively made up 23.2 and 18% of the total copepods and total zooplankton, with an average of 3978 individuals m−3. On the other hand, adult copepods were more abundant than larval stages, with an average of 13 242 individuals m−3, forming 76.8 and 59.7% of the total copepods and total zooplankton respectively. Among the most dominant copepod species were Paracalanus crassirostris selleck chemicals and Oithona nana (36.5, 28.3 and 31.3, 24.3% of the total copepods and total zooplankton respectively). Rotifers formed the second most important group, comprising about 9.2% of the

total zooplankton count with an annual average of 2036 individuals m−3 ( Figure 3). Rotifers were mostly represented by Brachionus calyciflorus and B. plicatilis (forming 65, 6% and 2.8, 30.8% of the total rotifers and total zooplankton respectively). Although cladocerans were represented by 5 species, collectively they formed only about 3.9% of the total zooplankton density in the lake, with relatively

higher densities at the western and central sites of the lake (4–9). Molluscs and polychaetes were represented only by their larval stages, which made up about 4.7 and 2.7% of the total zooplankton count with respective Methocarbamol annual averages of 1029 and 592 individuals m−3 ( Figure 3). Lamellibranch and gastropod veligers constituted 55.1 and 44.9% of the total mollusc count respectively. Cirripede larvae accounted for 1% of the total zooplankton count, with an annual average of 211 individuals m−3. Chaetognaths was represented only by Sagitta enflata, which appeared infrequently and did not exceed 0.01% of the total zooplankton community. Decapod and echinoderm larvae were rare at some sites during spring and summer. The annual average zooplankton standing crop throughout the study area was 22 026 individuals m−3. As illustrated in Figure 2, the highest density (annual average: 33 645 individuals m−3) was recorded at site 5, followed by sites 4 and 6 (annual averages: 31 198 and 30 211 individuals m−3 respectively). Sites 1, 2, 3 harboured the lowest standing crop with a minimum density of 14 985 at site 3. Based on numerical abundance, copepods were the most dominant zooplankton group, making up the bulk of the zooplankton population in most of the studied sites (Figure 4).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>