7 In 2000, the Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published a review on the subject which commented on the low prevalence of GERD in Asia but also projected that, based on sparse published data available at that time, the disease appeared to be on the increase.8 For that review, references

were difficult to obtain, with few direct prevalence studies available. Since then, there has been a steady increase in published literature on GERD from the Asia-Pacific region. More recent studies with better defined study methodology are now available and have shown that GERD is in fact, not uncommon in Asia. Two Asian Pacific consensus meeting on GERD have been convened selleck and their proceedings published,9,10 and GERD is now considered an important disease in the Asia-Pacific region. The burden of GERD has been measured by determining the frequency of esophagitis

in endoscoped patients as well as the prevalence of GERD symptoms in the community or population. The latter has been thought to be a more accurate indicator of the true burden of GERD in a population, especially with the recognition of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) as the predominant disease subgroup. In the earlier years studies on GERD were based on the presence of erosive esophagitis at endoscopy. Gastroscopy affords objective visualization of reflux-associated damage to the lower esophagus. The definition of esophagitis used, however, has been variable, and this has led to differences in the rates of esophagitis reported. For example, in the older Savary-Miller classification, find more erythema was considered as already Grade 1 esophagitis, whereas in the more recent and now more widely used Los Angeles classification, a breach in the esophageal mucosa must be evident before a diagnosis of esophagitis can be made. Studies based on reflux symptoms have been thought to be a more reliable indicator of GERD but symptom-based diagnosis has also not been easy. click here Many studies have used predominant symptoms of

heartburn and acid regurgitation as a marker of GERD, but there has been great variability in the definition of GERD based on the frequency, and sometimes on the severity, of symptoms. Reflux disease specific questionnaires have now been constructed, and their application has allowed a more consistent and reliable way of measuring the burden of disease.11,12 A summary of the published reports on esophagitis in Asia is shown in Table 1.1,13–32 The prevalence of erosive esophagitis ranges from < 1.0% to 20.8%. This considerable variability in values could be due to different groups of patients studied: routine health screening patients, patients screened for gastric cancer, patients with dyspepsia or upper gastrointestinal symptoms or all gastroscoped patients.