docs not by itself induce entrainment and to eliminate the nonspecific disturbance of the animals. MEL administration via timed access to drinking water has been shown to be an efficient way to entrain free-running activity rhythms in the rat: the entrainment occurs at the same Y-27632 research buy circadian phase

and with the same phase angle to MEL onset.131 However, like the bolus administration experiments, this technique docs not allow precise control of the duration of the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical peak MEL signal. The duration of MEL is known to provide essential information, at least in photoperiodic terms. To address these points, a chronic infusion device has been developed, which allows the animal freedom of movement in its cage and provides continuous drug infusion (over several months) of controlled duration and dose without handling.132,133 Daily infusions of MEL for 1, 8, or 16 Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical h, or twice 1 h entrained the circadian rhythms of core body temperature, running-wheel activity, and general activity to 24 h. Nevertheless, regardless of the dose, the efficiency of MEL infusion decreased if it. lasted a long time (16

h). During entrainment, when the intrinsic period of the circadian pacemaker is equal to the period of the Zeitgeber (or synchronizer), it is assumed that the pacemaker Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical maintains a constant phase relation with the Zcitgeber. With daily injection or oral administration of Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical MEL, the onset of activity is linked to the time of administration and the phase angle is close to zero. When MEL is administered by daily infusion, the phase angle difference between the entrained rhythm and the Zeitgeber (MEL) depends upon the duration of the infusion period. A negative phase angle is observed and its value increases with the duration of the infusion period.

In Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical addition to the effects on phase angle, another response has been observed. With an 8-h infusion and more evidently with a 16-h infusion, MEL administration induced a change in the free-running period in the first days. The period was Dichloromethane dehalogenase lengthened compared with the saline infusion, suggesting that MEL delays the pacemaker each day until entrainment occurs. In other words, with a long duration of infusion, entrainment occurs earlier than predicted by the model based on the MEL injection experiments. Moreover, the magnitude of the change in period increased significantly with the duration of that infusion. These observations cannot, be explained on the basis of a sensitivity window, but rather suggest, that the chronobiotic properties of MEL imply an active mechanism on the circadian clock. This conclusion is supported by the results obtained after a “skeleton” infusion; two 1-h infusions with an interval of 15 h, corresponding to the extremities of the 16-h infusion.