Conclusions The delivery of poorly soluble drugs using nanoparticles has received much interest recently for both the oral and intravenous routes of administration. However, much of the published literature evaluates the effect of nanoparticle formulations in pharmacokinetic studies. Thus, there buy Combretastatin A4 is a need to examine the impact of nanoparticle delivery in pre-clinical efficacy models. Our current work compares both pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor efficacy for paclitaxel delivered using a standard commercial formulation and a nanosuspension. We found that nanosuspension delivery reduced paclitaxel’s anti-tumor efficacy. This, to our best knowledge, was never been investigated before. The paclitaxel

dose used in our study was chosen in an attempt to match clinically relevant exposures and resulted in robust efficacy in the xenograft tumor-bearing mice when delivered selleck with the commercial formulation. Based on our findings, the reduced anti-tumor activity associated with nanosuspension delivery appeared to be a result of non-sink dissolution conditions present at the paclitaxel dose used in our study. Finally, the current case study NF-��B inhibitor illustrates a need for careful consideration of both compound dose and systemic solubility prior to utilizing nanosuspension as a mode of intravenous delivery. References 1. Malingre MM, Terwogt JM, Beijnen JH, Rosing H, Koopman FJ, van Tellingen O: Phase 1 and pharmacokinetic

study of oral paclitaxel. J Clin Oncol 2000,18(12):2468–2475. 2. Huizing MT, Misser

VH, Pieters RC, Ten Bokkel Huinink WW, Veenhof CH, Vermorken JB, Pinedo HM, Beijnen JH: Taxanes: a new class of antitumor agents. Cancer Invest 1995, 13:381–404.CrossRef 3. Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC: Paclitaxel (Taxol). N Engl J ADP ribosylation factor Med 1995, 332:1004–1014.CrossRef 4. Weiss RB, Donehower RC, Wiernik PH: Hypersensitivity reactions from Taxol. J Clin Oncol 1995, 8:1263–1268. 5. Sparreboom A, Van Asperen J, Mayer U, Panday N, Huizing MT, Huinink TB: Limited oral bioavailability and active epithelial secretion of paclitaxel caused by P-glycoprotein in the intestine. PNAS 1997, 94:2031–2035.CrossRef 6. Sonnichsen DS, Liu Q, Schuetz EG, Schuetz JD, Pappo A, Relling MV: Variability in human cytochrome P450 paclitaxel metabolism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995, 275:566–575. 7. Walle T, Walle UK, Kumar GN, Bhalla KN: Taxol metabolism and disposition in cancer patients. Drug Metab Dispos 1995, 23:506–512. 8. van Asperen J, van Tellingen O, van der Valk MA, Rozenhart M, Beijnen JH: Enhanced oral absorption and decreased elimination of paclitaxel in mice cotreated with cyclosporin A. Clin Cancer Res 1998, 4:2293–2297. 9. Webster L, Linsenmeyer M, Millward M, Morton C, Bishop J, Woodcock D: Measurement of Cremophor EL following Taxol: plasma levels sufficient to reverse drug exclusion mediated by the multidrug resistant phenotype. J Natl Cancer Inst 1985,85(20):1685.CrossRef 10.