Interestingly, MiTat1.5-derived sVSG induced substantial IL-6 cytokine release in the presence of IL-1β. None of the stimuli induced IL-12p70 in contrast with LPS-matured and AnTat1.1-derived sVSG-stimulated Sirolimus cost DCs, which secreted high amounts of all cytokines tested (Fig. 1C, Supporting Information Fig. 1D). Furthermore, LPS or AnTat1.1-derived sVSG stimulation of DCs showed a higher relative

mRNA expression of the Th1-cell instructive Notch ligand Delta4 and of Jagged1 but downregulated Jagged2 (Fig. 1D). In contrast, the T. brucei antigens mfVSG and MiTat1.5-derived sVSG induced high expression of the Th2-cell associated Jagged2 but showed only low levels of Delta4 and this to a similar extent as TNF stimulation (Fig. 1D). Together, TNF

and the T. brucei antigens AnTat1.1-derived mfVSG and MiTat1.5-derived sVSG only partially mature DCs as detected by BMS-907351 purchase upregulation of surface markers, no or low cytokine production and high relative expression of the Notch ligand Jagged2. In contrast, the AnTat1.1-derived sVSG resembles more LPS-matured DCs. Therefore, and within the major scope of this study, subsequent experiments were conducted with the T. brucei-derived mfVSG and MiTat1.5 sVSG antigens. In addition, we prepared BM cells from mice deficient in TLR4 and/or MyD88 adaptor protein signaling to define which pattern recognition receptor cascade is required for the observed partial maturation phenotypes. DCs defective in TLR4 Chlormezanone signaling still upregulated MHC II and CD86 upon mfVSG exposure, but largely failed to increase surface markers expression in TLR4/MyD88−/− DCs (Supporting Information Fig. 1C). Surprisingly, maturation

by MiTat was almost completely blocked in DCs insensitive for TLR4-mediated stimuli and this to a similar extent as LPS-treated DCs. In contrast, MHC II and CD86 upregulation remained unimpaired upon TNF conditioning of TLR4 insensitive or TLR4/MyD88−/− DCs. Together, these data indicate that T. brucei-derived antigens induce distinct partial maturation stages in DCs dependent on MyD88 signaling. Since the previous experiments did not reveal major differences in the maturation profiles of TNF-, LPS-, or VSG-stimulated DCs, we performed microarray analyses with the differentially stimulated DCs to cover a broader spectrum of gene regulation. After 24 h, treatment cells were prepared for the arrays. The data indicated that LPS stimulation was very different from that by TNF, mfVSG, and sVSG (MiTat1.5) and the latter were highly similar to each other and not so different from untreated DCs (Fig. 2A). More detailed analyses of differentially expressed genes indicated that only 175 genes were induced after TNF, 160 with mfVSG, 466 with MiTat1.5 sVSG but 4969 with LPS were changed more than two-fold over untreated DCs (Fig. 2B). The whole microarray array data are accessible under GEO (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).