JM performed the metabolic analysis. AV performed the quantitative PCR analysis. ZY performed the fluorescent antibody experiments. AP, TP, MP, CS, and MK conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background Thiamine (vitamin B1) is an essential molecule for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, mainly because its diphosphorylated form (thiamine diphosphate, click here ThDP) is an indispensable cofactor for energy metabolism. In microorganisms, thiamine monophosphate (ThMP) is an intermediate in ThDP synthesis but, like free thiamine, it has no known physiological function. In addition to ThMP and ThDP, three other phosphorylated thiamine derivatives have been characterized: thiamine triphosphate (ThTP), and the newly discovered adenylated

derivatives adenosine thiamine diphosphate (AThDP) [1] and adenosine thiamine triphosphate (AThTP) [1, 2]. ThTP was discovered more than 50 years ago [3] and was found to exist in most organisms from bacteria to mammals [4]. Its biological function(s) remain unclear but, in E. coli, it was shown to accumulate transiently as a response to amino acid starvation, suggesting that it may be a signal required for rapid adaptation of the bacteria to this kind of nutritional Torin 1 cell line downshift [5]. The recent discovery of adenylated thiamine derivatives has complicated the picture. First, these derivatives are unlikely to exert any cofactor role similar to the catalytic role of ThDP in decarboxylation reactions for instance. Indeed, the latter mechanisms rely on the relative lability of the C-2 proton of the thiamine moiety, evidenced by a chemical LOXO-101 supplier shift (9.55 ppm) definitely

higher than expected for usual aromatic protons (7.5 – 8.5 ppm). In adenylated derivatives, the chemical shift of the C-2 proton is intermediate (9.14 – 9.18 ppm), suggesting a through-space interaction between thiazole and adenylyl moieties, and CYTH4 a U-shaped conformation of these molecules in solution [1]. This is not in favor of a possible catalytic cofactor role of AThDP or AThTP, which are more likely to act as cellular signals. AThDP has been only occasionally detected in biological systems (and only in very low amounts), but AThTP, like ThTP, can be produced by bacteria in appreciable quantities (~15% of total thiamine) under special conditions of nutritional downshift: while ThTP accumulation requires the presence of a carbon source such as glucose or pyruvate [5], accumulation of AThTP is observed as a response to carbon starvation [2]. In E. coli, the two compounds do not accumulate together: their production indeed appears as a response to specific and different conditions of metabolic stress. Little is known about the biochemical mechanisms underlying the synthesis and degradation of triphosphorylated thiamine derivatives. No specific soluble enzyme catalyzing ThTP synthesis was characterized so far.