“Objectives: Assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily


“Objectives: Assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily tadalafil or tamsulosin versus placebo during 12 weeks on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in Korean men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: Following a 4-week placebo run-in period, 151 Korean selleck products men were randomly assigned to receive once-daily tadalafil 5 mg, tamsulosin 0.2 mg, or placebo for 12 weeks. Results: The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) least squares mean changes from baseline to endpoint were numerically

but not significantly improved in the tadalafil (−5.8) and tamsulosin (−5.4) groups compared with placebo (−4.2, P > 0.05). Decreases in IPSS obstructive and irritative subscores, IPSS Quality of Life score, and BPH Impact Index from baseline to endpoint were largest in the tadalafil group followed by tamsulosin, though none separated significantly from placebo. Increases in maximum urinary flow rate were small and not significantly different than placebo; the increase was largest in the tadalafil group

(2.5 mL/sec), followed by the placebo (2.3 mL/sec) and tamsulosin (2.1 mL/sec) groups. The percentage of subjects reporting at least one treatment-emergent adverse event was 26.5, 13.7 and 3.9% in the tamsulosin, tadalafil and placebo groups, respectively. Conclusions: In this pilot study in Korean men, those with BPH and treated with tadalafil 5 mg or tamsulosin 0.2 mg once daily experienced a reduction in LUTS, which was numerically (but not statistically) significant compared with the placebo. Tadalafil was well tolerated and I-BET-762 manufacturer few subjects discontinued the study due to treatment-emergent adverse events. Larger studies in Asian men with BPH and LUTS treated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are needed. “
“Objectives: To compare the effects of obybutynin and tolterodine in neurogenic bladder patients with spina bifida in a crossover study.

Methods: Seven myelomeningocele and one spinal lipoma cases, maintained with obybutynin and clean intermittent catheterization for more than 60 months, were enrolled. Age ranged from 8 to 23 years (mean 12.0, male/ female = 2/6). After 2 weeks of washout period, obybutynin (0.3 mg/kg, maximum 12 mg) or tolterodine (0.12 mg/kg, maximum 4 mg) was administered for 4 weeks, and then switched to Ureohydrolase the other drug for 4 weeks. At the end of the three periods, the patients and/or parents documented urinary storage status and adverse effects, and urodynamic study was performed. Results: In seven cases undergoing sequential urodynamic study, the baseline compliance of the patients (6.81 ± 1.83) increased to 9.98 ± 4.97 by obybutynin and 10.16 ± 2.53 by tolterodine (P < 0.05 for each). Better compliance was noted in two cases with tolterodine and in two cases with obybutynin. Stronger adverse effects were reported in three out of eight patients (37.5%) by obybutynin and three out of eight patients (37.5%) by tolterodine.

Comments are closed.