Participants who used to smoke, but have quit were excluded from the analysis (N = 6). Heart rate was measured using a three-lead buy BLZ945 electrocardiogram (ECG) and was monitored constantly throughout the entire stress procedure. The ECG was sampled at 512 Hz and stored on a flashcard by means of a portable

digital recorder (Vitaport™ System; TEMEC Instruments B.V., Kerkrade, The Netherlands). After completion of the recording, all physiological data were imported and processed on a Personal Computer using a Vitascore™ software module (TEMEC Instruments BV, Kerkrade, The Netherlands). A customized software program calculated the interbeat intervals (IBI) of the ECG using R-top detection, resulting in IBI time series.

This time series was inspected for detection and removal of artifacts. HR time series were calculated from these IBI time series and expressed in beats per minute (bpm); the HR time series were subsequently averaged per period during the stress procedure. For purposes of the analyses, the stress procedure was consolidated into three periods: a pre-task rest period (Rest), the period during any of the three stress tasks that elicited ABT-199 manufacturer the maximum HR response (Task), and a post-task recovery period (Recovery). As expected, the maximum HR response occurred for most participants during either the mental arithmetic task (33.8%) or the speech part of the public speaking task (49.8%). Self-reported perceived stress (Dieleman et al., 2010) was assessed after the rest period, each of the tasks and at the end of the procedure. Participants answered seven questions (e.g., ‘Can you feel your heart beating?’, ‘Are you nervous?’) using a visual thermometer ranging from 0 (not at all) Hydroxychloroquine solubility dmso to 8 (very much). The scores were summed to a total score of PS for each period/task, Task PS entailed the maximum PS score during any of the three stress tasks. In previous studies examining heart rate reactivity, age (Phillips et al., 2009), gender (Back et al., 2008), pubertal stage (Carroll et al., 2008),

body mass index (BMI; Carroll et al., 2008), oral contraceptive (OC) use (Girdler et al., 1997), socioeconomic status (SES; Miller et al., 2009), internalizing and externalizing problems (Greaves-Lord et al., 2007 and Ortiz and Raine, 2004), parental substance use (Finn et al., 1992) and time of test session (Sheffield et al., 1997) have been taken into account. We assessed pubertal stage using self-reported Tanner stages (Marshall and Tanner, 1970). SES was based on the higher occupational level of either parent (Statistics, 2010) and coded into low (x = 1), average (x = 2) and high (x = 3) SES. Internalizing and externalizing problems were evaluated using the Youth Self-Report (YSR; Achenbach and Rescorla, 2001). Scores on subscales affective, anxiety and somatic disorders were summed, leading to number of internalizing problems.