Patients and methods: This retrospective study includes 524 patie

Patients and methods: This retrospective study includes 524 patients with a history of hypersensitivity to NSAIDs admitted to undergo challenge test to an alternative anti-inflammatory drug. Statistical significance was achieved when odds ratio (OR) and risk ratio (RR) values were >1.

Results: 8.39% of patients with hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs showed a positive challenge test for Selleck PF-573228 the alternative drug. Challenge tests for nonselective COX-2 inhibitors were positive in

16.2% of patients with previous reaction to a same drug class and in 12.9% of patients with a history of reaction to selective COX-2 inhibitors. No positive challenge test to a non-selective COX-2 inhibitor was found In patients with a history of hypersensitivity to nimesulide (CAS 51803-78-2). Challenge tests for selective COX-2 inhibitors were positive in 4.6% of patients with a previous reaction to nonselective COX-2 inhibitors and in 7.2% of patients with a history of reaction to selective COX-2 inhibitors. The RR of a positive challenge test to a non-selective COX-2 inhibitor BAY 57-1293 concentration was significant in patients who had a history of reaction to an analogous compound (P 0.21,

OR 1.31, RR 1.26).

Discussion: In this study, selective COX-2 inhibitors represented the class of NSAIDs less frequently reported as responsible of adverse reaction. These data underline that there is a higher risk to find a positive challenge test to a non-selective COX-2 inhibitor than to a selective one in patients with previous adverse reactions to a non-selective COX-2 inhibitor. Moreover, the data evidence that females could have a higher risk compared to males to develop an adverse reaction to selective COX-2 inhibitors.

In conclusion, it appears necessary to pay attention to the kind of NSAIDs reported as the cause of hypersensitivity in anamnesis, because it must be considered a successful guide in choosing the alternative drug to administer to the patient during the challenge test.”
“Objective: Calcitonin is well-known for its inhibitory actions on bone-resorbing osteoclasts and recently potential beneficial

effects on cartilage were shown. We investigated effects of salmon calcitonin (sCT) on the articular cartilage click here and bone, after destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) in normal and sCT over-expressing mice.

Design: Bone phenotype of transgenic (TG) C57BI/6 mice over-expressing sCT at 6 months and 12 months was investigated by (1) serum osteocalcin and urinary deoxypyridinoline and (2) dynamic and normal histomorphometry of vertebrae bodies. In subsequent evaluation of cartilage and subchondral bone changes, 44 10-week old TG or wild-type (WT) mice were randomized into four groups and subjected to DMM or sham-operations. After 7 weeks animals were sacrificed, and knee joints were isolated for histological analysis.

Results: Trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) increased 150% after 6 months and 300% after 12 months in sCT-expressing mice when compared to WT controls (P < 0.05).

Comments are closed.