Some LGN cells are achromatic, responding only to luminous intensity, while others are modulated by specific colors, typically classified as belonging to one of three wavelengths: short, medium and long (Wiesel and Hubel, 1966). Later work has shown a rich set of color-opponent pairs in CRFs (Reid and Shapley, 2002). We refer the reader to Solomon and Lennie for a review of color vision physiology (Solomon and Lennie, 2007). Selectivity for long wavelengths in the LGN is most common, in agreement with the large number of cones that are selective for long wavelengths (Wiesel and Hubel, 1966). Krüger determined that color-specific cells made up 90% of the population (Krüger, 1977).

Most cells displayed these characteristics when the stimulus was larger than the receptive field. The visual path is segregated into Sirolimus cost three major divisions at the LGN, magnocellular (M), parvocellular (P), and koniocellular (K), with functional differences between divisions largely consistent across species (Derrington

and Lennie, 1984, O’Keefe et NLG919 concentration al., 1998, Usrey and Reid, 2000, White et al., 2001 and Xu et al., 2001). M cells are typically achromatic, respond to higher temporal frequencies, and have large CRF centers. P cells have color-opponent structure in primates with input from two cone classes at middle and long wavelengths (Jacobs, 2008), respond to lower temporal frequencies, and have small CRF centers. Most K cells that have been described have strong input from short wavelength cones and have blue-on or blue-off CRF structure ( Hendry and Reid, 2000, Martin et al., 1997 and Tailby et al., 2008). According to Xu et al., a much isothipendyl larger portion of K cells, 34%, cannot be driven by drifting gratings, compared to only 9% of M cells and 6% of P cells ( Xu et al., 2001). Recent work in primates has shown

the presence of K cells with orientation selectivity that might help explain the findings of weak responses to grating stimuli ( Cheong et al., 2013). K cell characteristics also vary across K layers, suggesting that there might be several classes of K cells, and appear to be more heterogeneous across species ( Hendry and Reid, 2000). Xu and colleagues, as well as O’Keefe et al. (1998), looked only at owl monkeys but their combined findings agree with what Usrey and Reid found in both owl and squirrel monkeys, and with what Norton and Casagrande found in the pro-simian galago ( Norton and Casagrande, 1982). Both Xu et al. and Usrey and Reid’s studies found that spatial summation was linear for all LGN cells that fit the linearity-testing criterion of responding well to drifting gratings (subsequently some of the recorded K cells were not tested for linearity). Xu et al. focused on the properties of K cells while O’Keefe et al. and Usrey and Reid looked primarily at M and P cell properties. The characteristics of M and P cells that O’Keefe et al.