Subject sera were serially diluted, mixed with 100 infectious units of the respective HPV 16 or 18 PsV, and inoculated onto 293TT
cells in microtitre plates. Cultures were monitored by fluorescence microscopy for four to six days. Three serum titration endpoints were defined: NT100, the highest dilution of serum which completely blocked RFP expression (100% neutralization); NT90, the highest dilution which blocked 90% of RFP expression (90% neutralization) and NTpartial, the highest GW-572016 in vitro dilution which partially blocked RFP expression (>10% and <90% neutralization). All sera were tested in duplicate and geometric mean titres (GMT) were determined for each endpoint, except that NT90 and NTpartial endpoints could not always be determined, e.g., when the dilution following the NT100 endpoint showed no neutralization. HPV 16 or 18 PsV NAb seropositivity was defined as a GMT of ≥40 and was determined for each of the NT100, NT90 or NTpartial endpoints. Merck cLIA and TIgG testing was performed at Merck Research Laboratories as previously described [8] and [13]. Geometric mean antibody levels for both SB203580 clinical trial assays were expressed as milli-Merck units (mMU) per mL. The cLIA was considered positive if the result was ≥20 mMU for HPV 16 and ≥24 mMU for HPV 18; the TIgG
assay was considered positive if the result was ≥7 mMU for HPV 16 and ≥10 mMU for HPV 18. Testing laboratories were blinded to the dosing regimens. Self-collected baseline vaginal swab specimens (n = 303) from Group 3 subjects were tested for HPV DNA by the Roche Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test (Roche Diagnostics), which detects 37 high- and low-risk HPV types, including HPV 16 and 18. For the longitudinal antibody response assessments and calculations for assay correlation, eligible subjects Ketanserin were those who had baseline data available for all three assays and who were seronegative for PsV NAb (NT100) at baseline (Fig. 1). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for the respective pooled 7-, 18-, 24- and 36-month PsV NAb, cLIA and TIgG antibody levels. Multiple comparisons of the binomial seropositive proportions by study group and antibody assay were performed by the permutation resampling method [14].
The Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test was used to compare the 36-month antibody levels for each of the assays for (1) baseline HPV 16 or 18 seropositive vs. the respective baseline seronegative subjects, and (2) baseline HPV 16 or 18 DNA positive vs. the respective baseline HPV DNA negative subjects. All statistical calculations were performed using SAS v.9.1.3 (Statistical Analysis Software, Cary, NC). Correlations for the PsV NAb, cLIA and TIgG assays are shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1. PsV NAb and cLIA correlated more closely for HPV 18 than for HPV 16, whereas the correlation between PsV NAb and TIgG was similar for both HPV 16 and 18. Supplementary Fig. I. PsV NAb vs. cLIA and TIgG correlations at all time points post-vaccine. Correlation plots for PsV NAb vs.