Suboptimal vitamin D status, coupled with the unaccustomed physical activities associated with military training, may have profound effects on bone health. During bone remodeling, resorption and formation are coupled; however, once resorption occurs, bone deposition may require up to 90 days for completion [23], and may induce temporary weaknesses at remodeling sites. Evans et al. [10] noted increases in both Pitavastatin cost markers of bone formation and resorption during military training, similar to the findings of the present study. Similarly, studies assessing the effects of resistance-type training have documented increases in markers of bone
formation, and a reduction in markers of bone resorption [24]. The increase in markers of both bone resorption and formation observed in the present study may indicate a mechanism to repair microdamage caused by repeated stress. If stress continues to affect bone, microdamage may further develop into stress RAAS inhibitor fractures. Stress fracture is of particular concern in military personnel, as up to 60% of female Soldiers that experience fracture
may attrite from military training [12, 25, 26]. Studies reviewing stress fracture risk in military personnel indicate that a number of factors not affected by diet, such as female sex, menstrual status, contraceptive use, or polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor, may be strong predictors of fracture risk [8, 12, 25]. Other factors, such as optimizing vitamin D status, may provide the opportunity to limit fracture risk through intervention.
For example, Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase Ruohola et al. [7] found that serum levels of 25(OH)D below the study population median (76 nmol/L) at the onset of military training was a significant risk factor for stress fracture in Finnish male military personnel. Burgi et al. [14] confirmed the relationship between 25(OH)D levels and stress fracture risk; in a case–control study with female Navy recruits it was determined that stress fracture risk was approximately double in volunteers who began training in the lowest quintile of 25(OH)D levels (35 nmol/L) as compared to those in the top quintile (124 nmol/L). In a recent randomized, placebo-controlled intervention trial, Lappe et al. [12] found that daily provision of supplements containing 20 μg of vitamin D and 2000 mg of calcium reduced stress fracture incidence by up to 20% in female Navy recruits during training. Although this nutritional intervention appears beneficial for the prevention of stress fracture, the study did not include biochemical or functional assessments of serum 25(OH)D levels, PTH or bone health. As such, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding the mechanism by which supplementation with vitamin D and calcium may have conferred protection.