They refined earlier views going back to Ekman’s theory of boundary layer dynamics. Among other things, it is acknowledged that onshore flows

in the interior and bottom boundary layers along with coastal upwelling take place in order to compensate for the wind-driven offshore flow in the surface layer. As follows from observations (Lentz and Chapman, 2004 and Kirincich et al., 2005), the upwelling extends seawards no more than 10 km when the bottom slope geometry Rapamycin cost is comparable to that shown in Figure 2b. In this case, a sediment particle, just detached from the bottom by the compensation flow, starts to move shorewards in the bottom boundary layer and gradually surfaces as a result of turbulent mixing. As soon as it arrives in the surface layer, the particle moves downwind and can occur to the west of GDC-0199 the site of detachment if particle’s sinking speed is fairly slow. Under an onshore wind, the same particle moves continuously shorewards from the detachment site. Another cause of radiance looping in the zonal profile is the fact that the bottom-to-surface distance is much shorter on the source side of the offshore wind-driven current than in the case of the

onshore wind. The shorter this distance, the more probable the occurrence of a resuspended particle at the top of the layer from which the water-leaving radiance originates. It is hardly possible to directly apply our findings

to other shallows in seas and oceans because of the local specificity of this one in the Caspian Sea. Nevertheless, the pattern of a radiance loop due to equally strong winds of opposing directions appears more or less universal. This is because bottom inclination is typical of coastal shallows, and the crossing of upper and lower branches of the loop is unavoidable at the shallow’s boundary where before the dependence of radiance on sediments, resuspended by compensation flow, becomes negligible compared to other factors giving rise to radiance. The wind-induced resuspension of bottom sediments is the most important factor of water-leaving radiance enhancement, inherent to marine shallows, judging in terms of the area affected by the radiance loop effect. In terms of the magnitude of the enhancement, the leading role belongs to the bottom reflectance at sites where waters are fairly transparent and the most shallow. Backscattering of resuspended particles develops at the expense of bottom reflection because a cloud of particles in the water shades the bottom. Thus, the strengthening of resuspension results in a reduced contribution of bottom reflectance into the radiance of a marine shallow. Both effects have to be accounted for when retrieving concentrations of chlorophyll, suspended matter and other constituents of shallow waters from remotely sensed radiance.