While many factors may contribute to protection against rotavirus, mTOR inhibitor a high titre of rotavirus serum IgA antibody is generally accepted as a surrogate marker for protective immunity and as a potential correlate of rotavirus vaccine efficacy [23], [24], [25], [26] and [27]. The results of the Cohort 1 (healthy adult volunteers) study suggested that highest antigen concentration planned for infant cohort (106.4 FFU per serotype per dose) was

well tolerated and safe, based on which the infant study was initiated. The vaccine was safe in infants, based on the lack of change in laboratory parameters and lack of related serious adverse events. All the five groups; BRV-TV 105.0, BRV-TV 105.8, BRV-TV 106.4, Rotateq and placebo were comparable in terms of reactogenicity events, solicited and unsolicited adverse buy Pictilisib events. The recipients of the highest antigen concentration of BRV-TV (106.4 FFU per serotype per dose) had the maximum seroresponse for serum IgA antibodies, whereas the placebo group reported the minimum seroresponse. The dose–response pattern was similar using either the three fold or four fold increase criteria for seroresponse. This is the first rotavirus vaccine study in India, albeit with small sample size, where an in-development vaccine has been evaluated head to head with a licensed rotavirus vaccine and a placebo. Although the Rotateq

vaccine because has been evaluated for safety and immunogenicity in Indian infants, the differences in study design between this study and the published data do not allow us to make valid comparisons of the immune response [28]. Per the current study results, the immune response following the administration of highest antigen concentration of the BRV-TV vaccine was higher than that of the licensed vaccine, which may be expected because of the higher antigen titre. Overall, the BRV-TV vaccine and the licensed vaccine had comparable immune and safety profiles in this study. The

strengths of the study are that an investigational vaccine was evaluated head to head with a marketed rotavirus vaccine and a placebo in a randomized single blind setting allowing for valid comparisons. Additionally the investigational vaccine (at three antigen concentrations) and Rotateq were administered along with other routinely administered pediatric vaccines, thus allowing for safety and immunogenicity to be assessed as the vaccine would be administered in routine use. As already indicated, the major limitation was the inability to establish statistical conclusions from the data due to a limited sample size. With increasing adoption of the rotavirus vaccines in national immunization programs across the world, placebo controlled efficacy studies for each registration strategy would pose unique ethical and regulatory challenges.