While, specific parental behaviours such as Parents’ perceived ability to

withhold frequent cariogenic snacks from their children even when they fussed for selleck compound it was inversely associated with the presence of dental decay in their child. Not all beneficial practices, however, had beneficial effects on dental caries; in this study, the frequency of tooth-brushing and/or tooth-brushing with supervision did not have a positive influence on the child’s caries experience. Although this agrees with some studies[27, 28], others have reported lower caries levels associated with frequent tooth-brushing[20, 29]. The controversial results and conclusions may be due to acidogenicity of biofilm or poor tooth-brushing techniques of children and/or their caregivers.

Interestingly, none of the factors mentioned in this JAK2 inhibitors clinical trials section were significantly associated with dt/ds, implying the role of other more important indicators when assessing caries severity. Nevertheless, the information derived from both Gao et al.’s (2010)[4] and this study provides practical guidelines to steer health promotion efforts to specifically target certain knowledge and practices, especially for children and parents with higher caries rate in Singapore. Because of the perceived discomfort of many individuals with the disclosure of their family income, the type of dwelling was chosen to measure the socio-economic status (SES) in this study. In this study, the caries experience was not consistently associated with the type of dwelling, a relationship that has been otherwise well documented in other published reports[4, 30]. The inconsistent association could have been a function of the sampling from the public health medical clinics, which itself may be selective for patients from the lower socio-economic group. The utilization Vorinostat of the type of housing may also be a crude measure for the measurement

of socio-economic status in Singapore as it does not account for the extremely high housing cost in Singapore (e.g., more than 50% of the population live in government housing developments) as well as other social and cultural factors that may be unique in this country (e.g., extended family units etc). The limitations of this study include intra-operator reliability, small sample size, convenience sampling, the potential underestimation of caries experience because only a visual-tactile examination, without radiographs, was employed, and the innate inaccuracies in the answers encountered in the interviewer-administered questionnaire (e.g., truthful answers). Improvements to the current questionnaire could be made in future studies by the inclusion of specific questions with regard to fluoride intake (e.g.