The electrochemical performance observed

for CNS material

The electrochemical performance observed

for CNS material is very interesting given the fact that CNS’s production cost is away cheaper than activated carbon. The cost of activated carbon is about $15/kg whereas the cost to manufacture CNS soot as by-product from large-scale milling of abundant graphite is about $1/kg. We believe this technology will boost the performance and stability of the lithium ion batteries while driving the price of actual anode materials down from $20 to $40/kg to about $5/kg. In particular, for stationary energy storage applications, Endocrinology antagonist cost along safety is the most important factor to consider. In order for the hybrid CNS-silicon material to show great promise for use in fabricating electrodes for a new breed of low-cost and high-performance lithium ion batteries, the size of silicon particles needs to be refined at the nanometer scale along with a process development to effectively remove the native silicon oxide. To that end, characterization of a half-cell configuration of proposed anodes is being carried out and results will Entinostat be compared with AC-based anode in terms of specific

capacity, efficiency, and degradation using cyclic voltammetry analysis. Acknowledgments This material is based upon work supported by the State of Texas Fund to the University of Houston Center for Advanced Materials. FCRH wishes to thank the University of Houston and the Government of Texas for the startup funding. References 1. Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM, Sinitskii A, Sun Z, Slesarev A, Alemany LB, Lu W, Tour M: Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2010, 4:4806–4814.CrossRef 2. Lai LF, Chen L, Zhan D, Sun L, Liu L, Lim SH, Poh CK, Shen Z, Lin J: One-step synthesis of NH 2 -graphene from in situ graphene-oxide reduction and its improved electrochemical properties. Carbon 2011, 49:3250–3257.CrossRef 3. Eda G, Fanchini G, Chhowalla M: Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material. Nat Nanotechnol 2008, 3:270.CrossRef 4. Hummers WS, Offeman RE: Preparation of graphitic oxide. J C-X-C chemokine receptor type 7 (CXCR-7) Am Chem

Soc 1958, 80:1339.CrossRef 5. Niyogi S, Bekyarova E, Itikis ME, McWilliams JL, Hammon MA, Haddon RC: Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128:7720.CrossRef 6. Park S, Ruoff RS: Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat Nanotechno 2009, 4:217.CrossRef 7. Beaulieu LY, Eberman KW, Turner RL, Krause LJ, Dahn JR: Failure modes of silicon powder negative electrode for lithium secondary batteries. Electrochem Solid State Lett 2001, 4:A137.CrossRef 8. Besenhard JO, Yang J, Winter M: Will advanced lithium-alloy anodes have a chance in lithium-ion batteries? J Power Sources 1997, 68:87.CrossRef 9. Lazertinib in vitro Hatchard TD, Dahn JR: Study of the electrochemical performance of sputtered Si1-xSnx films. J Electrochem Soc 2004, 151:A838.CrossRef 10.

Comments are closed.