Epha3/4pMNΔflox embryos displayed severely defective formation of

Epha3/4pMNΔflox embryos displayed severely defective formation of epaxial sensory pathways (compare Figures 3A–3C and 3D–3F, see also Figures S3G and S3J). At the same time, hypaxial sensory pathways remained unaffected in these mutants ( Figures S3I and 3L). Both the frequency and pattern of these epaxial this website sensory projection defects were virtually indistinguishable from those observed in Epha3/4null embryos ( Figure 3G). Because in Epha3/4null embryos no alterations in DRG sensory neuron numbers were detected we could rule out that the selective epaxial projection defects in these mutants were caused by loss of a subset of sensory neurons ( Figures

S3N). Moreover, in both Epha3/4pMNΔflox and Epha3/4null embryos the absence of epaxial sensory projections was further accompanied by a consistent increase in diameter of the hypaxial nerves ( Figure 3H and Figures 3I–3L). This suggested that sensory projections that failed to extend epaxially instead grew hypaxially in these mutants ( Figures 3M–3N). We next tested whether these sensory projection defects were accompanied find more by similar defects in epaxial motor projections. Neither Epha3/4pMNΔflox nor Epha3/4null embryos showed absence of epaxial motor projections, thus ruling out that the failure to form epaxial sensory projections was due to the loss of epaxial motor projections (compare Figures 3J and 3L; see also Figures S3H and S3K). We next asked whether loss of epaxial sensory

projections in these mutants could have been caused by hypaxial

misrouting of epaxial motor axons. We tested this by retrogradely tracing of hypaxially projecting motor neurons by focal injection of fluorescent cholera toxin B (CtxB) into hypaxial intercostal nerves. In both control and Epha3/4null animals this effectively labeled hypaxial motor neurons residing within the lateral division of the medial motor column (MMCl) ( Figures S3O–S3Q and S3R–S3T). At the same time, neither in control nor in Epha3/4null embryos were epaxial motor neurons in the medial MMC (MMCm) labeled by hypaxial CtxB injection ( Figures S3O–S3U). Thus, removal of motor axonal EphA3/4 selectively disrupts epaxial sensory projections, without resulting in the hypaxial misrouting of epaxial motor axons ( Figures 3M–3N). In addition to the sensory projection Oxalosuccinic acid defects, both Epha3/4null and Epha3/4pMNΔflox mutants display misrouting of epaxial motor axons into DRGs due to loss of repulsive EphA3/4 signaling in motor growth cones (data not shown) ( Gallarda et al., 2008). We therefore asked whether the requirements of EphA3/4 for determining epaxial sensory projections could be uncoupled from their actions in repelling motor growth cones from DRGs. To address this, we tested how sensory projections would develop upon eliminating EphA3/4 repulsive intracellular signaling, while retaining the ability of motor axonal EphAs to engage their putative interaction partners on sensory axons.

coli O157:H7, and L monocytogenes able to grow in media suppleme

coli O157:H7, and L. monocytogenes able to grow in media supplemented with rifampicin (Rif) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 50 μg/ml were isolated and used in experiments in which the inoculation level was near the indigenous microbiota level. Unless otherwise specified, culture media were obtained from BD (Franklin Lakes, NJ), and were supplemented with Rif. The isolates were stored at − 80 °C in tryptic soy broth (TSB) supplemented with 15% glycerol (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ). The single-strain inocula were prepared as described by Uesugi et al. (2006). Hydroxychloroquine The frozen stock culture was streaked for isolation onto tryptic soy agar (TSA: tryptic soy broth plus 1.5% granulated agar) and

incubated at 37 ± 2 °C for 24 ± 3 h. A 10-μl sterile loop of this culture was transferred into 10 ml of TSB and incubated at 37 ± 2 °C for 24 ± 3 h; this transfer procedure into TSB was repeated once. An aliquot (1 ml) of the second overnight culture was spread over large TSA plates (150 by 15 mm) and incubated at 37 ± 2 °C for 24 ± 3 h. The resulting bacterial lawn was collected by adding 9 ml of a 0.1% peptone to each plate and scraping the surface of the plate with a sterile spreader (Lazy-L Spreader,

Andwin Scientific, Tryon, NC). The harvested cells (11 log CFU/ml) were diluted, as appropriate, with 0.1% peptone to inoculum levels ranging from 4 to 11 log CFU/ml. The five-strain mixtures of Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, or L. monocytogenes were prepared by growing each strain separately (under the conditions described Alpelisib cell line above) and then combining equal volumes of each strain to produce the target inoculum. The populations

in the individual and final Dichloromethane dehalogenase mixed inocula were determined by serial dilution in Butterfield’s phosphate buffer (BPB) and plating onto media as described below. Inshell walnuts were inoculated as described by Uesugi et al. (2006) for almond kernels. Inshell walnuts (400 g) were weighed into a sterile bag, inoculum (25 ml) was added, and the sealed bag was shaken and rubbed by hand for 2 min. Inoculated walnuts were spread onto four layers of filter paper (57 by 46 cm sheets; Qualitative P-5 Grade, Fisher Scientific) that was placed into a lidded plastic container (leaving a 3- to 5-cm gap to allow for air exchange). Walnuts were dried under ambient conditions for 24 ± 2 h. After drying, inshell walnuts were placed in sterile plastic bags and manually mixed by shaking for 2 min. To evaluate pathogen survival on inshell walnuts, inoculated and control nuts were stored in unsealed bags within closed plastic containers held at refrigerator (4 °C) or ambient conditions for periods of 12 weeks to 3 years, depending upon the experiment. Condensate was not observed in the bags or on the walnuts during storage. Data loggers (TempTale 4, Sensitech Inc., Beverly, MA) were placed in each storage area to record temperature and relative humidity (RH).

In this context the effect of MTSET on R3C is of interest Wherea

In this context the effect of MTSET on R3C is of interest. Whereas MTSET at R3C blocks proton current by this website more than 90% (at pH 6), Gu+ current (at pH 8) is only blocked by about two-thirds. Combined with our observation

that the hHv1 selectivity mutants are more permeable to Gu+ than to smaller metal cations and that arginine at R3 is unique in preventing Gu+ conduction, this suggests that selectivity depends on more than size exclusion. Another factor in proton selection could involve charge transfer via titration of one or more amino acid side chains, as shown to form a proton-selective omega pore in the Shaker VSD when single arginines are substituted with histidine (Starace and Bezanilla, 2001 and Starace and Bezanilla, 2004). Indeed, D112 was recently proposed to be such a titratable residue, although some proton permeation was preserved when D112 was mutated to nontitratable residues (Musset et al., 2011). In this case the change Selleckchem Pifithrin-�� from the native arginine at R3 to the longer combined side chain of R3C with the appended MTSET would need to explain a change in the titration of D112 that virtually abolishes proton conduction. Additional work will be required to determine the contribution to selectivity of a constricted watery canal versus side chain titration, or, alternatively, a possible contribution of MTSET on gating. Two

alignments of S4 between hHv1 and the Kv1.2 K+ channel have been suggested, creating some uncertainty about the environment and interaction partners of the arginines and their role in proton conduction (Wood et al., 2011). In suggesting an electrostatic interaction between R3 and D112 in the open state of the channel, our results argue for an alignment that maps the R3 of hHv1 onto R4 of Kv1.2. This is in line with alignments proposed by previous studies (Ramsey et al., 2010 and Gonzalez et al., 2010). Two previous experimental studies proposed that the depolarization-driven outward motion of S4 replaces S4 arginines with N4 in the pore to open the channel (Tombola et al., 2008 and Gonzalez Mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease et al., 2010), but another study found voltage-gating to be preserved

without both R3 and N4 (Sakata et al., 2010), leaving the gating mechanism unresolved. Our findings would suggest that a truncated S4 lacking residue R3 would either lose proton selectivity or have to open in another position of S4, which placed a remaining arginine into the narrow part of the pore. In conclusion, our results suggest that in hHv1 R3 enters a short narrow segment of the pore in the open state, where it interacts with D112, and that together these residues assemble to form the selectivity filter for the channel. We propose that the pore of hHv1 runs through its VSD, along the pathway taken by the S4 arginines, and that gating of the pore involves the formation of the selectivity filter in the activated conformation of S4.

, 2000) In particular, constitutive TNFα has recently been impli

, 2000). In particular, constitutive TNFα has recently been implicated in control of the stability of neuronal networks in response to prolonged changes in activity via the phenomenon of synaptic scaling (Stellwagen and Malenka, 2006 and Turrigiano, 2008) and plays a specific role in ocular dominance plasticity upon monocular visual deprivation (Kaneko et al., 2008). The cytokine, released from astrocytes, was reported to strengthen excitatory synaptic transmission by promoting surface insertion of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) subunits Protein Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor (Bains and Oliet, 2007, Beattie et al., 2002 and Stellwagen et al., 2005). In the present study, we find that TNFα is also an obligatory factor for the induction

of synaptically effective gliotransmission Alectinib purchase at GC synapses in the dentate gyrus, specifically controlling glutamate release from astrocytes. Notably, constitutive levels of the cytokine promote functional docking and rapid coordinated secretion of glutamatergic vesicles in cultured astrocytes. Indeed, TNFα most likely determines the kinetics of

P2Y1R-dependent glutamate release in situ and the local extracellular concentration of the amino acid, a critical factor in the activation of pre-NMDAR and, ultimately, in the potentiation of GC synapses. To investigate the role of TNFα in astrocyte-dependent synaptic modulation in hippocampal dentate gyrus, we planned studies on Tnf−/− mice ( Pasparakis et al., 1996). Our previous work in rats established that purinergic P2Y1R, strongly expressed in astrocytic processes around GC synapses, respond to stimulation with the agonist 2-methylthioadenosine-5′-diphosphate (2MeSADP, 10 μM) Carnitine dehydrogenase by inducing a highly reproducible increase in mEPSC frequency in GCs ( Jourdain et al., 2007). We therefore decided to utilize this stimulus paradigm and recorded mEPSCs from hippocampal dentate GCs in acute mouse hemibrain horizontal slices

from P18–P23 mice. Recordings were performed 50–90 μm deep in the slices, where astrocytes and the patched GCs retained their integral tridimensional structures, as confirmed by two-photon imaging of cells fluorescently labeled with specific markers ( Figure 1A). Initially, we used slices from wild-type (WT) mice and applied 2MeSADP either by bath perfusion or locally, within the volume of the recorded GC, via pressure ejection from a micropipette. In both cases the P2Y1R agonist increased mEPSC frequency in GCs (bath application: +37% ± 11%; p < 0.05; n = 14 cells; local application: +32% ± 10%, p < 0.05; n = 7 cells), with no effect on the amplitude or kinetics of the currents ( Figure 1B and see Figure S1 available online). The effect of the drug on mEPSC frequency was abolished in the presence of N6-methyl-2′-deoxyadenosine-3′,5′-bisphosphate (MRS2179 10 μM; n = 7 cells), a P2Y1R blocker, confirming the specific involvement of this purinergic receptor subtype.

The somatosensory system of the Fmr1 knockout mouse model for fra

The somatosensory system of the Fmr1 knockout mouse model for fragile X syndrome exhibits delayed plasticity at the thalamocortical synapse and abnormal cortical connectivity and plasticity during the sensory-dependent critical period (Bureau et al., 2008 and Harlow et al., 2010). Another model for autism spectrum disorders, the Ube3a mouse model for Angelman syndrome, also shows abnormal synaptic plasticity during experience-dependent maturation of sensory cortical circuits (Sato and Stryker, 2010 and Yashiro et al., 2009). In this case, however, visual deprivation restores plasticity. In contrast to the Ube3a mouse model, we show that abnormal plasticity is

elicited with deprivation in Mecp2 null mice. Cobimetinib price The differences in findings between these mouse models for autism are probably due to the distinct molecular mechanisms involved, the area of the brain studied, or the age range examined. Yet, a common emerging theme among buy AP24534 mouse models for autism spectrum disorders is a disruption in experience-dependent

synaptic plasticity. Our results from Mecp2 null mice support the idea that distinct phases of synapse development are driven by different molecular mechanisms. We find that MeCP2 has a more prominent role in experience-dependent versus -independent synapse remodeling. The mechanism by which visual experience, as opposed to spontaneous

activity, imparts changes in synaptic circuits is still not clear. The MeCP2 protein has a number of phosphorylation sites that can be modulated in an activity- and experience-dependent manner ( Chen et al., 2003, Tao et al., 2009 and Zhou et al., 2006). Specific phosphorylation patterns may mediate distinct forms of plasticity. Moreover, MeCP2 regulates chromatin structure and function and thus the expression of thousands of genes ( Chahrour et al., 2008 and Skene et al., 2010). In the future it will be interesting to examine how different forms of activity influence neuronal chromatin structure, DNA methylation profiles, and MeCP2 phosphorylation during the various stages of synapse development. Mecp2 -/+ female Calpain mice (MeCP2tm1.1Bird, Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME; Guy et al., 2001) were mated with C57BL/6 males. Only homozygous and wild-type males were used in this study because heterozygous females are phenotypically variable due to X chromosome inactivation. For dark-rearing experiments, mothers with P20 litters were placed for 7–14 days in a lighttight container in which temperature, humidity, and luminance were continually monitored ( Hooks and Chen, 2006). Control (normally reared) animals were raised under a 12 hr light/dark cycle. All the procedures were reviewed and approved by the IACUC at Children’s Hospital, Boston.

, 2009 and Kilic et al , 2010) However, this amino acid change d

, 2009 and Kilic et al., 2010). However, this amino acid change does not have any detectable functional consequence in the receptor ( Schiffer et al., 2000), although it could convey aberrant gene dosage and/or unequal allele expression ( Schiffer et al., 2000 and Wilson et al., 2006). Indeed, mRNAs for GluK3 and other glutamate receptors are reduced in the frontal cortex of schizophrenic subjects ( Sokolov, 1998;

but see Meador-Woodruff et al., 2001). As for other subunits, GluK3 gene expression is developmentally regulated and aberrant gene dosage during development may impact disease in adulthood ( Wilson et al., 2006). Thus, further experiments selleck screening library using transgenic animals are warranted. learn more A clear example of gene dosage is provided by trisomy of chromosome 21, leading to Down syndrome. Grik1, the gene coding for GluK1 subunits, is located on human chromosome 21q22.1, and genetic mapping places

Grik1 in the vicinity of genes coding for APP and super oxide dismutase (SOD1; Gregor et al., 1994). However, linkage analysis failed to detect any association with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and there are no data indicating any role for GluK1 gene disequilibrium dosage in Down syndrome. Based on multiple regression analyses, it appears that the effects of anxiety and depression treatment are significantly and independently associated with the Grik4 gene ( Paddock et al., 2007). An association was also observed in female patients with markers in Grik1. Together,

these data indicate that reduced expression of Grik1, Grik4, and other genes encoding KAR subunits could be implicated in mood disorders (but see Li et al., 2008). However, the sign of this implication is clearly elusive and these linkages may be circumstantial given that causal mutations have not yet been identified why through linkage or candidate gene association studies. It is becoming clear that no conclusions can be reached without more precise information of the role of these subunits in general brain physiology. However, recent studies using experimental models have started to assess how the absence of one of these genes affects behavior. The ablation of Grik4 in mice results in marked hyperactivity ( Catches et al., 2012 and Lowry et al., 2013), one of the endophenotypes of patients with bipolar disorders, which has been interpreted as if lack of GluK4 activity has an anxiolytic and antidepressive-like effect ( Catches et al., 2012). Anxiety and depression are concurrent with bipolar disorders, and these data would in principle support the hypothesis that GluK4 hyperactivity could be a hallmark of bipolar phenotypes. However, genetic data from bipolar patients seem to refute this conclusion. In a case control association study, two SNP haplotypes (rs2282586 and rs1944522) exhibited a protective effect against bipolar disorder in a diverse Scottish population ( Pickard et al., 2006).

Furthermore, all prior studies almost certainly

sampled b

Furthermore, all prior studies almost certainly

sampled both excitatory and inhibitory neurons, but did not analyze those populations separately. The authors point out that when both classes of neurons are combined in population analyses, the increased response of the excitatory population to preferred familiar stimuli would be at least partially counterbalanced by the opposite effect in the inhibitory population. Along with the differences in the stimuli and experimental procedures, this may account much of the variability across previous studies. This study lends support to the idea that object recognition is mediated by a sparse code in ITC, in which objects are each represented by small populations Microbiology inhibitor of exquisitely tuned neurons. The current study suggests that learning would facilitate this coding scheme by increasing the response rate and sharpness of selectivity for neurons’ preferred familiar stimuli. As described above, this could lead to improvements in the ability of downstream areas to read out object information from excitatory projection neurons in ITC. Important questions remain regarding the encoding of object representations in ITC. For example, studies

which did not optimize stimuli or used small or homogeneous stimulus sets typically find highly significant stimulus selectivity for the tested stimuli despite weaker firing rates (Baker et al., 2002, Sigala and Logothetis, 2002 and Freedman et al., 2006). Thus, buy OSI-744 in addition to responding

very strongly to an optimal stimulus, ITC neurons also have the ability to discriminate between their nonpreferred stimuli. However, the degree to which object recognition is mediated by the few neurons that are optimally tuned for a stimulus or, instead, by the larger and more distributed population that is responding selectively (but at nonoptimal rates) remains to be determined. A number of related questions remain to be examined in future work. all For example, the current study examined ITC activity during a passive viewing task with limited behavioral demands. Thus, it will be interesting to compare the patterns of selectivity in putative excitatory and inhibitory neurons during more active and demanding tasks such as discrimination or memory-based matching. One way to assess whether recognition relies predominantly on the subset of strongly responsive excitatory neurons is to ask whether the activity of those neurons is better correlated with animals’ trial-by-trial perceptual judgments than other neuronal populations. A second question to explore is how ITC object representations change during the learning process itself. In the current study, monkeys were familiarized with a set of stimuli for several months prior to ITC recordings.

And yet the inhibition most often found in cortical cells has nei

And yet the inhibition most often found in cortical cells has neither the magnitude nor the orientation independence required to support the normalization framework. It is this observation that prompted our reexamination of the feedforward model. We find that when a series of biophysical properties common to nearly all neurons is incorporated into a feedforward model, all of the observed nonlinear properties of simple cells emerge (Figure 8, black points). None of these Cyclopamine concentration mechanisms is orientation specific and many are not even specific to the visual system.

Driving force nonlinearity on synaptic currents, spike threshold, and synaptic depression are found throughout the brain; trial-to-trial response variability click here (Churchland et al., 2010) and response saturation are found across many sensory and motor systems. Although the modified feedforward model accounts for much of the behavior of simple cells, it has only two free parameters: the number of presynaptic LGN cells and the aspect ratio of the simple cell’s subregions. Even these two parameters have a wide range of permissible values. All of the other properties of the model are experimentally constrained, including thalamocortical synaptic depression, the relationship

between Vm and spike rate, latency dispersion and contrast saturation in LGN cells, the driving-force nonlinearity on synaptic currents, and the membrane time constant. Thus, when the feedforward model is made realistic by the addition of very basic and well-characterized neuronal mechanisms,

the known properties of simple cells emerge per force. Among the biophysical mechanisms that contribute to cortical receptive fields, threshold has by far the most influence. Simple cells rest well below threshold and have very little spontaneous activity. The resulting iceberg effect narrows orientation tuning for spikes relative to Vm by as much as 3-fold or more, increases direction selectivity by 4-fold Rebamipide or more (Carandini and Ferster, 2000 and Lampl et al., 2001), increases spatial frequency selectivity (Lampl et al., 2001), enhances the distinction between simple and complex cells (Priebe et al., 2004), and increases ocular dominance (Priebe, 2008). Because of the iceberg effect, cortical connections need not be nearly as specific as they appear to be in measurements derived from spike responses; the Vm responses at the periphery of the tuning curve are hidden by threshold. Threshold might also have important implications for plasticity and development. The dramatic changes seen, for example, in ocular dominance plasticity are most often measured from spike responses. Changes in spike responses, however, might be generated by smaller shifts in the ocular dominance of Vm responses and therefore by relatively smaller changes in connectivity (Priebe, 2008).

On a neuronal level, these may reflect (1) content-selective atte

On a neuronal level, these may reflect (1) content-selective attentional weighting or surprise signals (see Roesch et al., 2012 for a discussion of such signals in reinforcement learning); BMS-354825 price (2) within- and/or between-subject variation in the direction of signed aPEs; or (3) spatial intermixing of signed and unsigned aPE neurons at a spatial scale that cannot be resolved with fMRI. We also emphasize that the objective of this study is not to make a strong claim about whether or not computations about expertise necessarily involve a Bayesian updating mechanism. Rather, the Bayesian algorithms used here provide

a tractable framework through which we have been able to implicate specific neural structures in mediating computations important for tracking expertise. Although

it is unlikely that subjects uncovered the full structure of the process underlying the agents’ predictions, it is nonetheless the case that the agents in our task did not learn to track the asset behavior (because their performance stayed constant throughout the study). We therefore use the term “expertise” loosely to refer to the participants’ beliefs about the performance level of an agent within a specified domain. This is most likely to be an oversimplification in the real world, where an agent’s expertise is likely to depend on context. For example, someone might be good at picking winning stocks in bull markets, but not in bear markets; or might be good at forecasting stocks, but not bonds. Furthermore, the difficulty of the setting will modulate Galunisertib molecular weight real-world agent performance Sclareol and likely expertise judgments. Determining the role of these contextual factors in evaluating others will provide a richer characterization of social learning in naturalistic settings. A total of 31 human subjects participated

in the experiment. Two subjects were removed from further analysis due to excessive head motion, one because of experimenter error during data collection, and three because they showed no behavioral evidence of learning, resulting in 25 subjects (eight females/17 males, mean age 25 years, age range 18–30). We excluded volunteers who were not fluent English speakers and who had any history of a psychiatric or neurological disorder. All subjects provided informed consent prior to their participation following the rules of Caltech’s IRB. Subjects performed a task in which they had to learn about the performance of a financial asset, as well as about the ability of human and computerized agents who would predict the performance of the asset. Every trial, the asset went up with probability pTRUEt and down with probability 1-pTRUEt. These probabilities evolved over the course of the trial according to the time series shown in Figure 2B (dashed line). Each element of pTRUEt was drawn independently from a beta distribution with a fixed variance (SD, 0.07) and a mean that was determined by the true reward probability on the preceding trial.

, 2004) and by an embryonic lethal phenotype of knockin mice in w

, 2004) and by an embryonic lethal phenotype of knockin mice in which the γ2 Tyr365/367 residues were mutated to phenylalanine, which interferes with AP2 binding (Tretter et al., 2009). Heterozygous γ2Y365/7F mice, however, are viable. In the stratum pyramidale of the

hippocampus they show a CA3-region-specific increase in the postsynaptic accumulation of GABAARs, suggesting different basal levels of γ2 Tyr365/367 phosphorylation in the CA3 versus CA1 region. The lethal phenotype of homozygous γ2Y365/7F mutants indicates that excessive GABAergic transmission is detrimental during early development, probably due to excessive GABAergic excitation, which may HIF inhibitor interfere with normal neurogenesis and neural migration (Wang and Kriegstein, 2009). Collectively, there is now conclusive evidence that GABAARs are subject to at least two major mechanisms of regulated endocytosis. These mechanisms involve

different phospho-sensitive interactions of the clathrin adaptor AP2 with β and γ2 subunits, respectively. The phospho-states of the relevant β and γ2 subunit motifs are subject to regulation by multiple Ser/Thr and Tyr kinases, as well as phosphatases and their respective adaptor proteins. Dynamic changes in the phosphorylation state of NSF and PRIP and their interaction with the AP2 binding site of β subunits provide additional levels of regulation. Future experiments will need to address whether NSF and PRIP compete with AP2 for GABAAR interaction and whether their interaction with GABAARs is regulated by phosphorylation of GABAARs. The decision of whether

buy Bortezomib endocytosed GABAARs are recycled or degraded is regulated by interaction of GABAAR β1-3 subunits with huntingtin-associated protein 1 (HAP1) (Figure 4) (Kittler et al., 2004b). HAP1 interacts with the Huntington disease protein huntingtin (Li et al., 1995 and Li et al., 2002) and is involved in motor-protein-dependent transport of neuronal cargo (Engelender et al., 1997, Gauthier et al., 2004 and McGuire et al., 2006). When overexpressed in cultured neurons, HAP1 interferes with the degradation of endocytosed GABAARs and thereby increases Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase the recycling and surface expression of GABAARs (Kittler et al., 2004b). More recent experiments have identified HAP1 as an adaptor for the kinesin superfamily motor protein 5 (KIF5), interacting directly with all three isoforms (A-C) of KIF5 heavy chains (Twelvetrees et al., 2010). HAP1, KIF5 heavy chains and γ2-containing GABAARs are partly colocalized in dendrites and can be isolated as a complex from brain lysates. Moreover, live imaging and electrophysiological recordings revealed that HAP1-KIF5-dependent vesicular trafficking controls the delivery of GABAARs to the plasma membrane and thereby promotes the function of GABAergic inhibitory synapses.