After 2 h, the sample vial was removed from the oil bath and allowed to cool slowly at room temperature. The contents of the reaction flask were transferred into a separating funnel and rinsed with
distilled water and ethyl acetate. The organic phase was dried over sodium sulphate, the drying agent was filtered off and the solvent removed by rotary evaporator to yield 2.7% of oil. The vial containing the oil was stored for later analysis at 4 °C. These procedures were conducted in triplicate. The methanolysis was carried out using a closed-vessel single-mode microwave system (Monowave™ 300; Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria), using standard Pyrex vessel (10 mL capacity). The reaction was performed at a fixed temperature internally measured by a ruby thermometer. The pressure in BMN 673 cost the microwave vessel during reaction achieved 6 bar under the best Src inhibitor conditions. The microwave irradiation equipment was operated in temperature control mode. Five hundred milligrams of Arabica green coffee oil were treated with 3 mL of methanol (see Section 2.4). The highest yield obtained for the hydrolysed coffee oil was 10.4%. The methanolysis efficiency was determined by using the sum of cafestol and kahweol HPLC chromatographic
peak areas, on the basis of the largest area being 100%. After heating time, the hydrolysed oil which dissolved in methanol was removed and the solid catalyst filtered in a paper filter. The solution was refrigerated at 4 °C
for later HPLC analysis. Analyses were performed in duplicate, and the data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) values. To determine repeatability, five different oils (500 mg) of the same sample were analysed using Lonafarnib clinical trial the same analytical method (hydrolysis conditions), in the same equipment at the same time (intraday repeatability). A two-factor, three-level, full-factorial design (32 FFD; Morgan, 1991) was used to analyse the response pattern and establish a model. The two independent variables used in the study were methanolysis time: 1, 3 and 5 min (X1); temperature: 80, 90 and 100 °C (X2), while the dependent variable was the total yield of the target compounds (as a recovery measurement obtained by HPLC analysis). Nine experiments were conducted to optimise the reaction conditions. The reactions were carried out in the presence of methanol (3 mL) and K2CO3 (0.05 g). The factors, experimental and predicted data obtained are shown in Table 1. The results of each design were analysed by using the software Statistica™ Version 7 (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK). Both linear and quadratic effects of each variable (factors) under study, as well as their interaction and significance, were evaluated by analysis of variance. A statistically significant multiple regression relationship between the independent variables (X1 and X2) and the response variable (Y) was established.